Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13023/87 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SALESI c. ITALIE
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention ... - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SALESI v. ITALY
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EKMR, 02.07.1990 - 13023/87
- EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13023/87
Papierfundstellen
- Serie A Nr. 257-E
Wird zitiert von ... (62)
- EGMR, 06.11.2008 - 58911/00
Rechtssache L. e.V. u.a gegen DEUTSCHLAND
Zwar hat der Gerichtshof mehrfach festgestellt, dass die vermögenswerte Art eines geltend gemachten Rechts einen unter Artikel 6 Abs. 1 fallenden Streit hervorrief (siehe z. B. Rechtssachen Salesi ./. Italien , Urteil vom 26. Februar 1993, Serie A Bd. 257-E, Rdnr.19, und Wos ./. Polen , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 22860/02, Rdnrn. 76, 77, EGMR 2006-...); dies bedeutet aber nicht, dass Streitigkeiten nicht-vermögenswerter Art zwangsläufig nicht von dieser Bestimmung erfasst sind. - EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE
1 (art. 6-1) does apply in the field of social insurance, including even welfare assistance (see the Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, pp. 59-60, para. 19). - EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 23621/11
Fröbrich ./. Deutschland - Stasi-Informant muss Entschädigung wegen DDR-Haft …
Der Gerichtshof hat bereits entschieden, dass, wenn eine Person einen Eingriff in ihre Mittel zur Bestreitung des Lebensunterhalts erfährt und einen individuellen wirtschaftlichen Anspruch geltend macht, der aus bestimmten, in einem Gesetz festgelegten Regeln erwächst, dieser als "zivilrechtlich" im Sinne von Artikel 6 Abs. 1 angesehen werden muss (siehe Salesi./. Italien, 26. Februar 1993, Rdnr. 19, Serie A Nr. 257-E).
- EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90
FISCHER c. AUTRICHE
[17] Judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, p. 59, para. - EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 24989/17
ÐURIC v. SERBIA
Turning to the present case, it is now well established that disputes over entitlements to social security or welfare benefits, including, for example, sickness benefits and welfare disability allowances, generally fall within the scope of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, for example, Fazia Ali v. the United Kingdom, no. 40378/10, § 58, 20 October 2015; Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860/00, § 40, 14 November 2006; Salesi v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 19, Series A no. 257-E; Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 46, Series A no. 263; Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands, 29 May 1986, §§ 25-40, Series A no. 99; and Deumeland v. Germany, 29 May 1986, §§ 59-74, Series A no. 100). - EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97
BOTTAZZI c. ITALIE
The Court notes at the outset that Article 6 § 1 of the Convention imposes on the Contracting States the duty to organise their judicial systems in such a way that their courts can meet the requirements of this provision (see the Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, p. 60, § 24). - EGMR, 14.09.2017 - 56665/09
KÁROLY NAGY c. HONGRIE
[15] See, among other authorities, Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands, 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99; Deumeland v. Germany, 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100; and Salesi v. Italy, 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E. - EKMR, 06.04.1994 - 18266/91
DÜMAN v. THE NETHERLANDS
Nevertheless, the development in the law that was initiated by those judgments and the principle of equality of treatment warrant taking the view that Article 6 § 1 (Art. 6-1) does apply in the field of social insurance, including even welfare assistance (see the Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, pp. 59-60, § 19).1 (Art. 6-1) of the Convention applies in the field of social insurance, including welfare assistance which is a unilateral benefit granted by the State (Eur. Court H.R., Salesi judgment of 26 February 1993,to be published in Series A no. 257-E, para. 19), the Commission considers that no distinction can be made between entitlement to benefits under the AAW and under the WAO in respect of the applicability of Article 6 para.
- EGMR, 19.07.1995 - 17506/90
KEROJÄRVI v. FINLAND
Having regard to the foregoing, the Court sees no reason to distinguish this case from previous cases in which it has found that disputes over benefits under a social-security scheme concern "civil rights" (see, in particular, the Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99, pp. 12-16, paras. 26-40; Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, pp. 59-60, para. 19; and Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no. 263, p. 17, para. 46). - EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 22860/02
WOS c. POLOGNE
Furthermore, the Court considered that there were similarities between the entitlement to welfare allowances which falls under the scope of "civil rights and obligations" (see Salesi v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 19, Series A no. 257-E) and the entitlement to receive compensation from the Foundation, regard being had in particular to the eligibility criteria of a claimant's financial difficulties and severe damage to his health as a result of Nazi persecution. - EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 52089/09
DERUNGS c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 33804/96
MENNITTO v. ITALY
- EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 22860/02
WOS v. POLAND
- EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 22015/05
WERZ c. SUISSE
- EKMR, 15.04.1996 - 20471/92
KUSTANNUS OY VAPAA AJATTELIJA AB ET AUTRES c. FINLANDE
- EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 40378/10
FAZIA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 14.11.2006 - 60860/00
TSFAYO v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 50389/99
DORAN v. IRELAND
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34256/96
DI MAURO c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 09.12.1994 - 19005/91
SCHOUTEN AND MELDRUM v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EGMR, 08.12.2022 - 34349/18
M.K. ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 35265/97
A.P. v. ITALY
- EKMR, 20.02.1995 - 19583/92
PELTONEN c. FINLANDE
- EGMR, 21.04.2015 - 44547/10
PIPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 19206/05
DAUTI v. ALBANIA
- EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 27744/95
T. AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 44808/98
MITCHELL AND HOLLOWAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
- EGMR, 01.12.1998 - 34462/97
WESSELS-BERGERVOET v. THE NETHERLANDS
- EKMR, 14.04.1998 - 25046/94
GROF c. AUTRICHE
- EGMR, 07.10.2010 - 7193/02
POKHALCHUK c. UKRAINE
- EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 74644/01
DONADZE c. GEORGIE
- EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 52917/99
SERINO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52835/99
CERBO, GUARNIERI, DI GIOIA ET BARBATO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52837/99
PASCALE, MASSARO ET ONOFRIO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52840/99
MONGILLO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52844/99
ROMANO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52847/99
VISCUSO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52833/99
SANTAGATA contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52846/99
DI MEO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52830/99
GIANNOTTA et IANNELLA contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52843/99
FRANCO ET BASILE contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52845/99
MAZZARELLI contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52836/99
TAZZA ET ZULLO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52831/99
SIMONE ET PONTILLO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52839/99
TANZILLO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52832/99
NERO, MONGILLO ET MARCHITTO contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52842/99
PASCALE contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52829/99
PALLOTTA contre l'ITALIE
- EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 52841/99
PANZA contre l'ITALIE
- EKMR, 21.10.1996 - 22377/93
T.M. c. FINLANDE
- EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 51391/08
GALLEZ ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE ET VERHAEGEN c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 05.02.2007 - 29086/05
VARVAROVSKY c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 30.11.2004 - 57319/00
KOVALOVÁ c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 09.12.2003 - 61805/00
MÍSAROVÁ contre la REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE
- EGMR, 14.03.2000 - 28338/95
BLOM v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 02.07.1997 - 27552/95
MACHATOVÁ v. THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
- EKMR, 21.05.1997 - 26258/95
GUSTAFSSON v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 10.04.1997 - 29303/95
KOVACHEV v. BULGARIA
- EKMR, 16.10.1996 - 27823/95
SIBBEL-BECKER v. SWEDEN
- EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 27122/95
ROMLIN v. SWEDEN
- EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 10736/03
VAANANEN v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 33440/96
FERRARI v. ITALY